Edward de Bono – Lateral Thinking: Book Review & Audio Summary

by Stephen Dale
Edward de Bono - Lateral Thinking

Lateral Thinking by Edward de Bono: A Practical Guide to Creative Problem-Solving and Innovation

Book Info

Audio Summary

Please wait while we verify your browser...

Synopsis

In this groundbreaking work, Edward de Bono introduces lateral thinking—a revolutionary approach to creativity and problem-solving that challenges our conventional thought patterns. Unlike traditional “vertical thinking” that digs deeper into established ideas, lateral thinking encourages us to explore new directions and perspectives. Through practical exercises and compelling examples, de Bono demonstrates how anyone can learn to break free from mental ruts and generate innovative solutions. This classic text provides step-by-step techniques for disrupting entrenched patterns, welcoming unconventional ideas, and transforming the way we approach challenges. Whether you’re seeking personal growth or professional innovation, this book offers timeless tools for unlocking your creative potential.

Key Takeaways

  • Lateral thinking complements vertical thinking by challenging established patterns and assumptions rather than reinforcing them
  • Setting quotas for alternative ideas forces us to move beyond our first instinct and explore multiple perspectives
  • There are no “wrong” ideas in lateral thinking—even improbable scenarios can spark breakthrough innovations
  • The mind’s pattern-recognition system, while efficient, can trap us in rigid thinking unless we actively disrupt it
  • Simple exercises like describing ambiguous images from multiple angles can strengthen lateral thinking skills

My Summary

Why We Get Stuck in Mental Ruts

I’ll be honest—when I first picked up Lateral Thinking, I was skeptical. Another book promising to unlock creativity? But Edward de Bono isn’t selling snake oil here. He’s offering something much more practical: a systematic way to think about thinking itself.

The book opens with a simple but profound observation about how our minds work. We’re essentially pattern-recognition machines, constantly organizing information based on past experiences. This is incredibly useful most of the time. Think about how you can read messy handwriting or recognize a friend’s face even in poor lighting. Your brain has learned patterns so well that it can fill in the gaps automatically.

But here’s the catch: the better we get at recognizing patterns, the more entrenched we become in them. We stop questioning whether there might be better ways to organize information or approach problems. We dig deeper into the same hole instead of looking for new places to dig.

De Bono calls this traditional approach “vertical thinking.” It’s the kind of thinking that takes an idea, reinforces it with data and logic, and plants it firmly in the ground. Vertical thinking is what got us through school—memorizing facts, following established procedures, arriving at the “correct” answer.

The Sideways Approach to Problem-Solving

Lateral thinking, by contrast, is about moving sideways. It’s about deliberately disrupting those comfortable patterns we’ve built up over years of experience. And here’s what I found most refreshing about de Bono’s approach: he’s not suggesting we abandon logical thinking. That would be absurd.

Instead, lateral thinking works alongside vertical thinking. Both are necessary. Both are valuable. But in our education system and professional lives, we’ve become so focused on vertical thinking that we’ve forgotten how to think laterally.

I saw this play out in my own career as an author. When I was working on my third book, I kept trying to make it fit the same structure as my first two. I was digging deeper into the same hole, so to speak. It wasn’t until I completely reimagined the format—thinking laterally about what a book could be—that I finally broke through my writer’s block.

De Bono emphasizes that lateral thinking isn’t some mystical gift that only creative geniuses possess. It’s a skill that can be learned and practiced. This was a revelation for me, and it’s probably the book’s most important contribution to the field of creativity studies.

Making Lateral Thinking Practical

One of the things I appreciated most about this book is that de Bono doesn’t just theorize—he provides concrete techniques you can use immediately. The simplest and most effective is the quota system.

Here’s how it works: instead of just saying you’re “open to new ideas,” you force yourself to generate a specific number of alternatives. Three to five different solutions. Three to five different interpretations. Three to five different approaches.

This sounds almost too simple to be effective, but it works. I’ve started using this technique when I’m stuck on a blog post or struggling with how to present information to my readers at Books4soul.com. That first idea that comes to mind? It’s usually the most obvious one, the one everyone else would think of too. But by forcing myself to come up with alternatives two, three, and four, I often stumble onto something genuinely interesting.

De Bono offers a great exercise to practice this: take a photograph from a magazine, remove all the context and captions, and come up with three different descriptions of what’s happening. A picture of people wading in shallow water could be flood victims, shipwreck survivors, or tourists heading to a ferry. Each interpretation is valid, and each opens up different avenues of thought.

I tried this exercise with my book club, and the results were fascinating. We used an ambiguous photo of a man standing in a doorway, and the descriptions ranged from “a homeowner surveying tornado damage” to “a real estate agent showing a fixer-upper” to “a son visiting his childhood home one last time before it’s demolished.” Each story was compelling, and each led us to think about the image in completely different ways.

The Power of Being Wrong

This might be the most counterintuitive aspect of lateral thinking, but it’s also one of the most liberating: wrong ideas can lead to right solutions.

De Bono shares the story of Guglielmo Marconi, who successfully sent wireless transmissions across the Atlantic Ocean. The fascinating part? Marconi based his work on the incorrect assumption that radio waves would follow the curvature of the Earth. They don’t—but his “wrong” idea led him to experiment in ways that ultimately worked for different reasons than he expected.

This principle has huge implications for how we conduct brainstorming sessions and creative meetings. Too often, we shut down ideas that seem impractical or incorrect. But in lateral thinking, every idea is welcome because you never know which “wrong” idea will spark the breakthrough you need.

I’ve seen this principle validated in contemporary research on innovation. A 2018 study published in the Journal of Creative Behavior found that teams that explicitly suspended judgment during ideation phases generated significantly more innovative solutions than teams that evaluated ideas as they went. De Bono was onto something decades before the research caught up.

Applying These Ideas to Everyday Life

So how does this translate to real-world situations? Let me share some specific applications I’ve discovered:

In career decisions: Instead of asking “Should I take this job or not?” try generating three completely different career paths you could pursue. Even if you don’t choose the wildest option, considering it might reveal aspects of what you truly want that you hadn’t recognized before.

In conflict resolution: When you’re stuck in an argument with a partner or colleague, try describing the situation from three different perspectives—yours, theirs, and a neutral observer’s. This lateral approach often reveals solutions that neither party had considered.

In content creation: If you’re writing, designing, or creating anything, force yourself to come up with three completely different approaches before settling on one. I do this now with every blog post, and it’s transformed my writing process.

In problem-solving at work: When faced with a business challenge, resist the urge to implement the first solution that comes to mind. Generate alternatives, even absurd ones. Sometimes the absurd idea contains a kernel of brilliance that can be refined into something practical.

In personal growth: When you feel stuck in life, try describing your situation in three radically different ways. Are you “trapped in a dead-end job” or “gaining valuable experience before your next move” or “perfectly positioned to make an unexpected pivot”? Each framing opens different possibilities.

Where the Book Shows Its Age

Now, I need to be honest about some limitations. Lateral Thinking was first published in 1967, and while the core principles remain sound, some aspects feel dated.

The examples de Bono uses are often from mid-20th-century business and technology contexts that may not resonate with modern readers. He also writes with a somewhat formal, academic tone that can feel dry compared to contemporary books on creativity like Creative Confidence by Tom and David Kelley or A Whack on the Side of the Head by Roger von Oech.

Additionally, de Bono doesn’t engage much with the neuroscience of creativity, which has advanced considerably since the book was written. Modern readers interested in the brain science behind creative thinking might want to supplement this with books like The Creativity Code by Marcus du Sautoy or research from cognitive psychologists like Robert Sternberg.

Some readers also find the exercises repetitive. De Bono really hammers home certain points, which can feel redundant if you’ve already grasped the concept. The book could probably be 20-30% shorter without losing its impact.

How It Compares to Other Creativity Books

Having read extensively in the creativity and innovation space, I can say that Lateral Thinking occupies a unique position. It’s more systematic than The Artist’s Way by Julia Cameron, which takes a more spiritual approach to unlocking creativity. It’s more accessible than The Act of Creation by Arthur Koestler, which is brilliant but dense.

Where de Bono really shines is in making lateral thinking teachable. Unlike books that suggest creativity is an innate gift, he provides a framework that anyone can learn. This democratic approach to creativity was revolutionary in 1967 and remains valuable today.

If I were to create a creativity reading list, I’d pair this book with Thinking, Fast and Slow by Daniel Kahneman for the neuroscience perspective, and The Innovator’s Dilemma by Clayton Christensen for applications in business innovation. Together, these books provide a comprehensive understanding of creative thinking from multiple angles.

Questions Worth Pondering

As I finished the book, I found myself wrestling with some interesting questions. How much of our resistance to lateral thinking is cultural? In Western education, we’re taught that there’s usually one right answer, and our job is to find it as efficiently as possible. What would our schools look like if we gave equal weight to lateral and vertical thinking?

I’m also curious about the relationship between lateral thinking and artificial intelligence. As AI systems become better at pattern recognition—essentially, vertical thinking—will lateral thinking become an increasingly valuable human skill? Or will AI eventually learn to think laterally too?

Final Thoughts from My Reading Nook

Reading Lateral Thinking reminded me why I love books that challenge how we think rather than just what we think about. De Bono has given us a practical toolkit for breaking out of mental ruts, and while the book may not be perfect, its core message remains as relevant today as it was over fifty years ago.

What strikes me most is how applicable these techniques are across every domain of life. Whether you’re an entrepreneur trying to disrupt an industry, a parent figuring out how to connect with your teenager, or a writer like me trying to find a fresh angle on a familiar topic, lateral thinking offers a way forward.

I’d love to hear from you in the comments: Have you tried any lateral thinking techniques? What’s your experience with breaking out of established patterns? And if you’ve read de Bono’s work, which exercises did you find most useful? Let’s learn from each other’s experiences and continue this conversation about creativity and innovation.

You may also like

Leave a Comment