Hit Makers by Derek Thompson: The Science of Popularity and What Makes Things Go Viral
Book Info
- Book name: Hit Makers: The Science of Popularity in an Age of Distraction
- Author: Derek Thompson
- Genre: Business & Economics, Social Sciences & Humanities
- Pages: 416
- Published Year: 2017
- Publisher: Penguin Press
- Language: English
- Awards: Winner of the 2018 Gerald Loeb Award for Best Business Book
Audio Summary
Please wait while we verify your browser...
Synopsis
In Hit Makers, Derek Thompson explores the fascinating science behind why certain products, songs, and ideas capture our attention while others disappear into obscurity. Drawing from psychology, economics, and cultural history, Thompson reveals that popularity isn’t just about quality—it’s about exposure, timing, and understanding human psychology. Through compelling stories ranging from impressionist paintings to pop music to product design, he demonstrates how hits are made through a delicate balance of familiarity and novelty. This insightful book challenges conventional wisdom about success and offers practical lessons for anyone looking to create something that resonates with audiences in our distracted, oversaturated world.
Key Takeaways
- Popularity is primarily driven by exposure and distribution rather than quality alone—being seen matters more than being perfect
- The MAYA principle (Most Advanced Yet Acceptable) explains why successful products balance familiarity with novelty to appeal to human psychology
- Repetition is fundamental to human taste, particularly in music, but strategic variation prevents boredom and maintains engagement
- Understanding the science of attention and preference can help creators, marketers, and entrepreneurs design products that resonate with audiences
- Historical context and timing play crucial roles in determining what becomes a cultural phenomenon versus what remains obscure
My Summary
Why Quality Alone Doesn’t Create Hits
I’ll be honest—when I first picked up Hit Makers, I expected another predictable business book about “going viral” or “hacking growth.” What Derek Thompson delivers instead is something far more intriguing: a deep dive into why we like what we like, backed by fascinating historical examples and solid research.
The book opens with a story that completely changed how I think about art museums. Thompson introduces us to Gustave Caillebotte, an impressionist painter whose work rivals Monet’s in technical skill and artistic vision. Yet while Monet’s water lilies draw crowds at every major museum, Caillebotte remains largely unknown. The difference? Pure exposure.
After Caillebotte’s death in 1894, his personal art collection—which included works by Monet, Degas, and other impressionist friends—was displayed at the Musée du Luxembourg in the first major impressionist exhibition. Ironically, none of Caillebotte’s own paintings made it into that show. The artists who were included became household names. Those who weren’t remained obscure, regardless of their talent.
This revelation hit me hard because it challenges the meritocratic fantasy we’re all raised to believe: that cream rises to the top, that quality always wins out. Thompson argues convincingly that distribution matters more than we’d like to admit. It’s an uncomfortable truth for creators, but an essential one to understand.
The MAYA Principle: Finding the Sweet Spot Between Boring and Bizarre
One of the most practical concepts in Hit Makers is Raymond Loewy’s MAYA principle: Most Advanced Yet Acceptable. Loewy was a French designer who essentially invented modern American industrial design, creating everything from the Lucky Strike cigarette package to the iconic Coca-Cola soda fountain to streamlined bullet trains.
Loewy understood something fundamental about human psychology: we’re simultaneously attracted to familiarity and novelty. We want things that feel comfortable and recognizable, but we also crave the excitement of something new. The magic happens in the tension between these two desires.
Thompson backs this up with research from Paul Hekkert, a Dutch professor who studied why people like or dislike various objects. Hekkert’s 2011 study confirmed what Loewy intuited decades earlier: people consistently prefer objects that balance typical and novel elements. A car needs to look like a car, but the most appealing designs incorporate unexpected features that set them apart.
I found myself thinking about this principle constantly after reading the book. It explains so much about product launches, fashion trends, and even social media content. The most successful innovations don’t completely reinvent the wheel—they put a clever spin on something already familiar.
Applying MAYA to Modern Content Creation
As someone who creates content regularly for Books4soul.com, the MAYA principle has become a guiding light. When I write book summaries, I need to balance familiar structures that readers expect with fresh insights that make each post worth reading. Too conventional, and readers get bored. Too experimental, and they feel confused or alienated.
This same principle applies whether you’re designing a product, writing a song, launching a startup, or creating social media content. The key is identifying what your audience already knows and loves, then introducing just enough novelty to feel fresh and exciting. It’s a delicate balance, but Thompson provides enough examples to help readers develop an intuition for it.
The Power of Repetition in Music and Beyond
Thompson dedicates significant attention to music, and for good reason—it’s one of the clearest laboratories for studying human preference. He points out that 90% of the music people listen to is music they’ve already heard before. Think about your own listening habits. How many times have you played your favorite songs on repeat?
This isn’t just about nostalgia or laziness. Our brains are wired to find pleasure in repetition and predictability. When we can anticipate what’s coming next in a song, it triggers a dopamine response. We feel smart for recognizing the pattern, and that recognition feels good.
But here’s where it gets interesting: pure repetition eventually becomes boring. The most successful songs incorporate strategic variation within their repetitive structures. Thompson explains this through research on mice (yes, mice!) which show that both humans and rodents respond positively to patterns with slight variations.
A mouse hearing a B note repeatedly will eventually tune it out. But if you play a B note several times and then throw in a C note, the mouse’s attention spikes. The unexpected variation within the familiar pattern captures attention. This is exactly what great pop songs do—they establish a pattern, repeat it enough to make it catchy, then introduce variations to maintain interest.
Beyond Music: Repetition in Marketing and Branding
The implications extend far beyond the music industry. Thompson’s insights about repetition explain why successful marketing campaigns repeat core messages while varying the execution. It’s why Apple’s product launches feel familiar yet fresh each time, or why successful TV shows maintain consistent formats while introducing new storylines.
In my own work, I’ve noticed that readers respond best when I maintain consistent themes and structures while varying specific examples and perspectives. The framework provides comfort; the variations provide engagement. It’s the same principle that makes hit songs work.
The Distribution Problem: Why Great Ideas Die in Obscurity
Perhaps the most sobering insight from Hit Makers is how many brilliant ideas, products, and artworks never find an audience simply because of distribution failures. Thompson isn’t arguing that quality doesn’t matter—it does. But quality without distribution is like a tree falling in an empty forest.
This reality is particularly relevant in our current age of information overload. There’s more content, more products, and more competition for attention than ever before. Standing out requires not just creating something good, but also understanding the networks, platforms, and channels that can amplify your message.
Thompson examines how hits spread through networks, emphasizing the importance of what he calls “dark broadcasters”—influential people who share content within their networks without necessarily being public figures. These connectors play a crucial role in determining what goes viral and what doesn’t.
Practical Strategies for Better Distribution
For creators and entrepreneurs, this means thinking about distribution from day one, not as an afterthought. Some practical applications include:
- Building relationships with influencers and connectors in your field before you need them
- Understanding the platforms where your target audience already congregates
- Creating content that’s inherently shareable—either useful, entertaining, or emotionally resonant
- Timing your launches to coincide with relevant cultural moments or conversations
- Investing in distribution channels as much as in product development
I’ve tried to apply these lessons to my own blog. It’s not enough to write insightful book summaries—I need to share them where readers are looking, engage with communities interested in these topics, and create content that people want to pass along to friends.
The Role of Timing and Cultural Context
Thompson also explores how timing and cultural context shape what becomes popular. The same idea can succeed or fail depending on when it’s introduced and what else is happening in the culture. This explains why some innovations that seemed ahead of their time eventually succeed when reintroduced years later.
The book discusses how certain songs, products, and ideas become hits because they arrive at exactly the right cultural moment. They tap into existing anxieties, desires, or conversations in ways that resonate deeply with audiences. This isn’t something creators can entirely control, but understanding cultural currents can help you position your work more effectively.
Strengths of Hit Makers
What I appreciate most about Thompson’s approach is his commitment to evidence-based analysis. He doesn’t rely on anecdotes or gut feelings—he brings in research from psychology, neuroscience, economics, and cultural studies to support his arguments. As a senior editor at The Atlantic, Thompson has the journalistic chops to tell compelling stories while maintaining intellectual rigor.
The book is also remarkably accessible. Thompson writes in a conversational style that makes complex ideas easy to grasp. He uses vivid examples from art, music, technology, and business to illustrate his points, which keeps the content engaging even when discussing abstract concepts.
Another strength is the book’s breadth. Thompson doesn’t limit himself to one industry or medium. By examining hits across different domains—from paintings to pop songs to product designs—he reveals universal principles that apply regardless of what you’re creating.
Limitations and Criticisms
That said, Hit Makers isn’t without limitations. At 416 pages, the book can feel long, and some readers might find that Thompson belabors certain points. There’s also a tension between the book’s descriptive analysis (explaining why things become popular) and prescriptive advice (telling you how to create hits). Thompson is stronger on the former than the latter.
Additionally, while the book acknowledges that luck plays a role in success, it perhaps doesn’t emphasize this enough. The danger with any book about “the science of popularity” is that it might give readers false confidence that success is predictable and controllable. The reality is messier—even with perfect execution of Thompson’s principles, there’s no guarantee of creating a hit.
Some readers have also noted that the book focuses heavily on media and entertainment industries, which may limit its applicability to other fields. While the principles are broadly relevant, readers in B2B industries or niche markets might struggle to see direct applications.
Comparing Hit Makers to Similar Books
Hit Makers occupies interesting territory alongside books like Malcolm Gladwell’s The Tipping Point, Jonah Berger’s Contagious, and Chip and Dan Heath’s Made to Stick. Like these books, Thompson explores why certain ideas spread while others don’t. However, Thompson brings a more comprehensive historical perspective and engages more deeply with academic research than Gladwell’s anecdote-driven approach.
Compared to Berger’s Contagious, which focuses specifically on social transmission and virality, Hit Makers takes a broader view of popularity across different eras and media. Both books are valuable, but Thompson’s historical examples provide context that Berger’s contemporary focus lacks.
Questions Worth Pondering
Reading Hit Makers left me with some questions I’m still mulling over. If popularity is so dependent on exposure and distribution rather than quality, what does this mean for how we evaluate art, products, and ideas? Should we be more skeptical of what’s popular, knowing that excellence and popularity don’t always align?
Also, in an age where algorithms increasingly determine what gets exposure, how do Thompson’s principles apply? The gatekeepers have changed from museum curators and radio programmers to YouTube’s recommendation engine and TikTok’s algorithm. Does this democratize hit-making, or just create new barriers to entry?
Final Thoughts and Takeaways
Hit Makers fundamentally changed how I think about success, popularity, and cultural influence. Thompson makes a convincing case that creating hits isn’t about genius or luck alone—it’s about understanding human psychology, mastering distribution, and balancing familiarity with novelty.
For creators, marketers, entrepreneurs, or anyone trying to get their ideas heard in a noisy world, this book offers valuable insights. It won’t guarantee you’ll create the next viral sensation, but it will help you understand the landscape you’re operating in and make smarter strategic decisions.
What I love most about Hit Makers is how it demystifies popularity without being cynical. Thompson respects quality and creativity while honestly acknowledging the other factors that determine success. It’s a realistic, nuanced view that I found both sobering and empowering.
If you’ve ever wondered why certain things catch on while others don’t, or if you’re trying to create something that resonates with an audience, Hit Makers is absolutely worth your time. Just don’t expect a simple formula—Thompson’s insights are more subtle and interesting than that.
I’d love to hear your thoughts if you’ve read the book. What examples of the MAYA principle have you noticed in your own life? Have you experienced the frustration of creating something great that never found its audience? Share your experiences in the comments below—I always learn from the Books4soul community’s perspectives.
Further Reading
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/30901608-hit-makers
https://www.theatlantic.com/author/derek-thompson/
https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/531571/hit-makers-by-derek-thompson/
